Junhyun Lee vs Chun-Ming Yam Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 11 Jun at 03:48 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

J. Lee vs C. Yam

Junhyun Lee
Junhyun Lee

Flag KOR KOR

l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
l
Chun-Ming Yam
Chun-Ming Yam

Flag HKG HKG

l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

23
Age
35
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
Ytd Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-To-Head: Lee 1 - 0 Yam

They have played 2 sets in total, with Junhyun Lee winning 2 and Chun-Ming Yam winning 0. The last match between Junhyun Lee and Chun-Ming Yam was at the M15 Harmon, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Junhyun Lee getting the victory 6-1 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Lee1
Yam0
Last H2H Matches:

(R1M15 Harmon(06-11-25)

Hard
KOR Flag
Junhyun Lee
6
6
HKG Flag
Chun-Ming Yam
1
0

J. Lee vs C. Yam H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
50.94% (54-52)Career Total W/L22.22% (12-42)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. Lee vs C. Yam Match Preview

  • When comparing recent second serve performances, Lee has a slight edge, winning 40.81% of points compared to Yam's 40%. How important is this stat? High correlation suggests it's significant for match predictions.
  • In return games, Lee demonstrates a clear advantage by winning 47.73% of their opponent's second serve points, overshadowing Yam's 33.33%. On first serve returns, Lee also leads with 29.78% compared to Yam's 20.9%. Could this be decisive in the match? These statistics strongly indicate a potential favorite.
  • Under pressure, Yam excels slightly, saving 57.14% of breakpoints, compared to Lee's 50.68%. How crucial is it to maintain focus under pressure? This stat is particularly valuable for in-game betting strategies.
  • Overall performance in the last year shows a stark contrast; Lee has won 56.25% of matches, while Yam has managed only 10%. Does historical performance tell the whole story? It provides a compelling head-to-head overview.
  • Lee performs best on hard surfaces with a 55% win rate, whereas Yam favors clay but only has a 25% win rate there. Is surface preference a major factor? Yes, especially since Lee excels on the hard court - a likely surface for the match.
  • In terms of player level, Lee has been more successful at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 56.25% of matches. Yam has yet to win at this level. How does the event level influence outcomes? It's relative, but Lee's experience gives them an edge.
  • Comparing opponent quality, Lee faces slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 274.91 versus Yam's 254.4. Does tougher competition sharpen a player's skills? It might, as it indicates Lee is accustomed to challenging opponents.
  • In deciding set situations, Lee has a 50% winning record, whereas Yam hasn't secured a victory in such instances. If the match reaches this stage, who is more likely to prevail? Lee's record suggests they are more likely to handle the pressure.
  • Break point conversion stats favor Yam, who converts 66.67% of opportunities compared to Lee's 38.46%. Does conversion efficiency give Yam a chance? While beneficial, other strengths may counterbalance this in Lee's favor.

Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match seems to favor Lee when considering recent performance trends and historical data. Although Yam exhibits slight superiority in break point conversion and saving breakpoints under pressure, Lee's consistency and success in broader match and surface-specific statistics cannot be overlooked.

Lee's higher winning percentage over the past year, coupled with a better record on hard courts—the likely surface for this match—suggests a strong performance advantage. Additionally, Lee's competitive experience against slightly higher-ranked opponents implies a readiness for challenging matches, adding confidence to their potential success.

In a scenario where the match extends to a deciding set, Lee's history of winning half of such situations contrasts sharply with Yam's lack of victories, suggesting an edge in clutch moments.

Considering these factors, Lee appears most likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match, based on the comparative analysis of form, surface proficiency, and match experience.

Junhyun Lee vs Chun-Ming Yam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Lee vs C. Yam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won1
1Aces (Total)0
3Total Double Faults2
1:13:50Avg. Match Time1:13:50
69% (24/35)1st Serve %60% (29/48)
83% (20/24)1st Serve Win %38% (11/29)
55% (6/11)2nd Serve Win %37% (7/19)
55% (6/11)Break Pts Won %50% (1/2)
63% (30/48)Return Pts Won %26% (9/35)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won → Match Won0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won → Match Lost0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost → Match Won0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Lee 45%, Yam 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lee 53%, Yam 38%.
Break Points Saved %: Lee 54%, Yam 52%.

J. Lee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Hong Kong - 01-09-2025

R1

KORC. Oh
L
7-6(5) 6-0
HardM15 Hong Kong - 25-08-2025

R2

FRAA. Weber
L
6-2 6-1

R1

RUSA. Aleshchev
W
6-3 2-6 6-3
HardM15 Nakhon Pathom - 18-08-2025

R2

THAT. Suksumrarn
L
6-2 6-4

R1

JPND. Sumizawa
W
3-6 6-4 6-1

C. Yam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM15 Hong Kong - 01-09-2025

R1

RUSB. Atlangeriev
L
6-3 6-1
HardM15 Hong Kong - 25-08-2025

R1

INDP. Aggarwal
L
5-7 6-1 6-2
I.hardM15 Singapore - 11-08-2025

Q1

SGPJ. Yasin
L
7-5 6-4
HardM15 Harmon - 09-06-2025

R1

KORJ. Lee
L
6-1 6-0
HardM25 Changwon - 02-06-2025

Q1

N/AU. Player
L
6-3 6-1
banner

J. Lee vs C. Yam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
50.94% (54/52)YTD Win/Loss22.22% (12/42)
50.21% (121/120)Sets Win/Loss25.64% (30/87)
50.11% (1175/1170)Games Win/Loss38.10% (392/637)
54.76% (46/38)Hard Win/Loss22.45% (11/38)
41.18% (7/10)Clay Win/Loss25.00% (1/3)
20.00% (1/4)Indoor Hard W/L0.00% (0/1)
0.05Aces Per Game0.01
60Aces Total6
0.12Double Faults Per Game0.02
133Total Double Faults12
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
187.54Average Opponent Rank142.81
62% (1846/2998)1st Serve %69% (443/642)
62% (1150/1846)1st Serve Win %55% (245/443)
45% (515/1152)2nd Serve Win %45% (89/199)
48% (130/271)Break Points Won % (Total)40% (12/30)
41% (1167/2867)Return Points Win %29% (164/563)
0% (0/0)Challenger W/L25.00% (1/3)
50.94% (54/52)Futures W/L22.00% (11/39)
50% (53/105)Best of 3 Sets Win %21% (11/53)
58% (11/19)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)50% (1/2)
53% (16/30)Deciding Set Win %27% (3/11)
87% (54/47)1st Set Won, Won Match63% (16/10)
11% (54/6)1st Set Won, Lost Match38% (16/6)
12% (52/6)1st Set Lost, Won Match3% (37/1)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Dzumhur Vs Etcheverry H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?